This claim is not deemed to be credible.
The flight crew detained the woman before she could detonate the device.
Malaysian Transport Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein told reporters last week: "There is no sound or credible grounds to justify their claims.
The group has conducted a blackjack casino montreal number of terrorist attacks in China.
If the diversion of Malaysia sala bingo eden brindisi Airlines 370 was not an act of terrorism, the other likely scenarios are a pilot suicide attempt, the piracy of the plane for some kind of economic reason or the commandeering of the aircraft by someone with an idiosyncratic motive.Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak told reporters over the weekend that "deliberate" action by somebody on board accounted for Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 veering off course.The al ejemplos juegos de azar para niños Qaeda-affiliated group, Jemaah Islamiyah, has a presence in Malaysia as well as in the Philippines and Indonesia.Beyond Uyghur militants or operatives of Jemaah Islamiyah, might there be other terrorist groups with the motivation and capability of pulling off the hijacking of the Malaysia Airlines flight?A terrorist group that might have a motive is the East Turkestan Islamic Movement, a separatist group in China founded by Uyghurs that has had some historical ties to al Qaeda and the Taliban.This plot was also foiled.
And would Jemaah Islamiyah, an Islamist militant group, target for attack the air carrier of a majority Muslim country on which quite a number of Muslims were likely traveling?
It is more plausible that the group would select a Western airline because Western embassies and Western brand-name hotels have been the focus of their previous attacks and plots.
Join us on Facebook/cnnopinion.
To answer that you have to assess both the capabilities and the intentions of the known terrorist groups that might want to hijack such a plane.Or there would be a credible claim of responsibility.Could the mystery of Malaysia Airlines 370 then be explained as an act of terrorism?Bolstering the view that Uyghur terrorists did not hijack the Malaysia Airlines flight, on Tuesday a Chinese official said that background checks on the passengers on the plane produced no evidence that any of the Chinese citizens on board were involved in terrorism.And you have to ask the question: Cui bono?They demanded the release of leading militants in Indian jails, a demand to which the Indian government acceded.It doesn't seem.